Conversation
jeffra
requested review from
RezaYazdaniAminabadi,
ShadenSmith,
arashashari,
awan-10,
cli99,
conglongli,
eltonzheng,
minjiaz,
niumanar,
samyam and
tjruwase
as code owners
RezaYazdaniAminabadi
approved these changes
Jun 21, 2021
ShadenSmith
approved these changes
Jun 21, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DeepSpeed itself does not require
torchvision, I think we originally added it to support our cifar example. However we should just have this requirement in the example code itself and not in base deepspeed. We ran into strange issues with torchvision and compiled versions of torch not being compatible, and thus made deepspeed trigger version mismatch errors.